I am the Queen of Awesome. My words do not represent my employer, but I bet you already knew that.
18829 stories
·
35 followers

RIP Metaverse, an $80 Billion Dumpster Fire Nobody Wanted

1 Share
RIP Metaverse, an $80 Billion Dumpster Fire Nobody Wanted

A few things on the end of Horizon Worlds, the metaverse that Mark Zuckerberg believed in so much that he renamed his company: 

1) It’s very sad that many of the people who worked on it have been unceremoniously laid off because their leaders appear to have no idea what they’re doing
2) lol 
3) lmao, even

Who could have possibly predicted this? 

When Zuckerberg announced Horizon Worlds not really all that long ago at a batshit livestream in October 2021, I wrote an article called “Zuckerberg Announces Fantasy World Where Facebook Is Not a Horrible Company.” During that livestream Zuckerberg said, “I believe technology can make our lives better. The future will be built by those willing to stand up and say ‘this is the future we want.’” The future Zuckerberg wanted, at that time, was not a future anyone else wanted. But he was bold enough to systematically light roughly $80 billion on fire, not because he was willing to stand up and paint a vision of the future, but because Facebook was mired in various horrendous scandals and because he needed to rebrand his company and needed something shiny to point at to keep Facebook’s stock price up. It is bad when actual economists say that money was thrown “into the toilet.”

Let’s check what I wrote then: “The future Zuckerberg went on to pitch was a delusional fever dream cribbed most obviously from dystopian science fiction and misleading or outright fabricated virtual reality product pitches from the last decade. In the ‘metaverse’—an ‘embodied’ internet where we are, basically, inside the computer via a headset or other reality-modifying technology of some sort—rather than hang out with people in real life you could meet up with them as Casper-the-friendly-ghost-style holograms to do historically fun and stimulating activities such as attend concerts or play basketball.”

Zuckerberg’s bold vision of the metaverse was a place where T-Pain would sell NFTs of imaginary sneakers at concerts attended by people sitting silently in their living rooms with computers strapped to their face, where Wendy’s could do integrated brand deals in which human-shaped avatars without legs could throw baconators at basketball hoops, and where Zuckerberg could pretend to know how to surf. Even on these pitiful metrics, the metaverse failed. “Whatever the metaverse does look like, it is virtually guaranteed to not look or feel anything like what Facebook showed us on Thursday,” I wrote at the time. 

Over the last few years, Zuckerberg has found another thing he can ruin via his trademark process of pouring kerosene on huge piles of money and throwing matches at it (perhaps a fun metaverse game?). Zuckerberg’s current bold vision for the future is one in which social media is not social media at all but is instead a bunch of highly customized AI-generated ads delivered to you via an increasingly creepy algorithm. Alongside this, it is a future in which Reality Labs—the division of Meta that created Horizon Worlds—makes AI camera glasses whose main use appears to be harassing women, traumatizing the underpaid content moderators who watch the footage in developing countries, and fashion statements for federal officials whose current mission is kidnapping undocumented immigrants. 

The complete and utter failure of the metaverse is a reminder not just of the fact that the future Silicon Valley is force feeding us is not inevitable, but that quite often these oligarchs quite simply cannot relate to real people, don’t know how or why people use their products, and very often have no idea what they’re doing. 

I remember the metaverse, crypto, web3 Venn diagram of hype very well—in fact, I remember sitting in meetings where VICE executives proposed renting land in the crypto-focused Decentraland metaverse to build a virtual VICE headquarters (where we all worked before 404 Media). I noted at the time that Decentraland was stupid, and that far fewer people were on Decentraland at any given time than were reading even a failed blog post on the website of our failing company. It didn't matter. The people “willing to stand up and say ‘this is the future we want’” wanted a virtual building in a virtual dead mall, and they got it. Was it because they were so brave and forward looking? Or was it because they were rich and powerful and could say this is the future we, the business people, the business knowers, want?

Read the whole story
angelchrys
3 hours ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

A Leawood dry cleaner closed 20 years ago. Its chemicals are still in the ground and slowly spreading

1 Share

Toxic chemicals linger at a long-gone dry cleaning business at 103rd Street and State Line Road in Leawood.

Tri- and Tetracholoroethylenes — banned or being phased out because of their links to Parkinson’s disease and certain cancers — have been in the soil and groundwater there since before 2010, spreading east and south toward the Missouri state line and Indian Creek.

But because a state fund to clean up dry cleaning chemicals is so strapped for money, the Leawood site has been on a wait list for years, and, given a relatively low priority ranking, may remain backlogged for an undetermined amount of time.

There’s been no documentation of health problems due to the pollution in the soil. It’s in a commercial area of paved parking lots and served by WaterOne.

Nevertheless, the contamination was concerning enough to impede work on a new county wastewater main recently, adding $153,173 to the project so the tainted soil could be dug out and properly disposed of before the pipe could be laid.

Contamination at 10314 State Line Road — the site of a former Pride Cleaners — came to light recently in county commission discussion of unexpected costs of building two new pump stations and a sewer main.

What we know about the site’s contamination

The county is planning sewer line work and allocated more than $153,000 to help pay for toxic soil cleanup at the old dry cleaners.
The county is planning sewer line work and has allocated more than $153,000 to help pay for toxic soil cleanup at the old dry cleaners. Photo credit Kylie Graham.

According to a 2018 report by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, businesses at the State Line Road address used dry cleaning chemicals and equipment from about 1985 to 1995. After that, it was a drop-off site until closing around 2007.

Groundwater preliminary investigations found above-risk levels of tricholoroethylene (TCE), tetracholoroethylene (PCE also known as perc) and dichloroethylene, as well as vinyl chloride.

TCE is an industrial degreasing solvent that has been used in refrigerants, paint removers, spray adhesives and as a spot remover in dry cleaning. It has been linked to Parkinson’s, kidney cancer, liver cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

All uses of TCE have since been banned in the U.S.

The Environmental Protection Agency also issued an order in late 2024 to begin a 10-year phaseout of PCE (though under the Trump administration, the EPA began reviewing that decision last year to potentially reverse it).

Dry cleaning chemicals have been a problem for decades because they tend to stay in the soil and move with groundwater like a slowly spreading stain. That is what is happening with the State Line site.

The report also found that contamination had slowly seeped about 300 feet to the east, almost to the state line, and far enough south to likely impact Indian Creek. The site is a commercial intersection, but there are homes immediately to the west, though the homes are uphill from the former cleaner.

Concerning as that may sound, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment has not given the Leawood site a particularly high priority ranking for cleanup funds.

KDHE officials said last month that the former Pride Cleaner site was ranked 121st of the over 200 sites in their backlog. That ranking can change, based on new listings or new information about existing contaminated sites, according to Jill Bronaugh, communications director at KDHE.

The State Line site is also not even close to being among the largest dry cleaning contamination sites in the state.

The Haysville area south of Wichita experienced one of the biggest plumes of contamination. A dry cleaning facility associated with that contamination closed in 1996, but it wasn’t considered a high priority for cleanup until more information became available in 2016 and 2017, indicating that it had moved into private well water.

How we got here

A 2010 photograph of the old Pride Cleaners from a Jund 2010 environmental site assessment report.
A 2010 photograph of the old Pride Cleaners from a 2010 environmental site assessment report. Photo via Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

Prior to the mid-1990s, cleaners could dispose of their wastewater down the drain. But things changed in 1995, as people sought pollution cleanup and the federal government became more involved.

In 1995, the Kansas Legislature set up a trust fund meant to ease some of the expenses of cleanup on small dry cleaning business owners, which can run to millions.

The fund’s money comes from a $100 per facility annual registration fee, fees paid by solvent purchasers (the dry cleaners themselves), a deductible of $5,000 per site for business owners who take advantage of the fund and a surcharge on customers.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has 226 contaminated dry cleaning sites in its backlog. Image via Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has 226 contaminated dry cleaning sites in its backlog. Image via Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

Because lawmakers have not adjusted the fees to keep up with inflation, that fund is now running seriously behind what it needs to keep up with pollution mitigation.

According to KDHE figures, the trust fund receipts have plunged since 2007, from about $1.4 million a year to a recent annual average of $721,000.

As a result, cleanup has been slow going. KDHE has only resolved 18 sites since 1995. It now has 226 on its backlog.

Lawmakers try a third time

Now, as the legislature enters its final weeks of regular deliberations this year, lawmakers are trying for a third time to make changes intended to add more money to the fund and hasten cleanup.

Lawmakers on the House Water Committee writing the bill say they are under pressure to do something to beef up the fund because if they don’t, the EPA could step in and run the cleanup itself.

“I don’t think anyone wants that,” said Rep. Lindsay Vaughn, an Overland Park Democrat and the ranking minority member on the water committee.

The bill in question, Senate Bill 184, was proposed as a way to increase the funds, but ran into snags from some lawmakers who worried the tax increases would be too hard on small-business dry cleaners and would cause them to go out of business.

In its original form, SB 184 would have doubled the surcharge customers pay on dry cleaning from 2.5% (or 25 cents for every $10) to 5%. It would also double the deductible for users from $5,000 to $10,000, which KDHE testimony says is close to what it would be if it had kept up with inflation since 1995.

Those two changes would increase the annual fund revenue to $1.39 million, Kate Gleeson, deputy secretary of environment for KDHE told a recent water committee meeting.

Proponents said the bill would benefit business owners who want to clean up their sites as well as developers who hesitate to buy a location with pending contamination issues.

The bill has been negotiated with industry representatives in a way that tries to be fair, Vaughn said, noting that the burden is shouldered by the industry that caused the pollution.

“If we want to be the ones responsible for addressing this contamination then we have to find a way to fund it,” she said.

Rep. Alexis Simmons, a Shawnee County Democrat, said the untreated soil and water can cause other expenses in health problems and cognitive declines that will also drag down communities.

But the Dry Cleaning and Laundry Institute, a trade association representing the industry, urged lawmakers not to pass the bill.

Small mom-and-pop dry cleaners are still reeling from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has reduced dry cleaning demand because of remote work and more casual dressing, said Jon Meijer, director of membership for the institute, in testimony before the committee.

Increasing the surcharge that customers pay could cause more of a loss of customers, he said, noting that he would prefer a higher deductible.

This week, the committee approved a compromise. The surcharge would be raised only from 2.5% to 3% the first year, and then increase by 0.5% increments every two years until it reaches 5%.

Rep. Doug Blex, a Republican from southeast Kansas, said he still disliked raising the surcharge because “we’re punishing people for the sins of the past.” At an earlier meeting, he took the same position.

“We have a real problem of punishing people for events that happened 40 years ago and the environment somewhat heals itself,” he said, adding that he doubts the contamination problems are as bad as they were a few years ago. “You spank people when they’re bad.”

Vaughn said the compromise kept the change incremental while also addressing the problem in the fund.

But Rep. Fred Gardner, a Republican from eastern Kansas, said that with the shrinking dry cleaning industry and the number of sites to clean up, the compromise will only be a partial fix to the problem.

“I think it’s a good step, but I don’t think it’s the total solution,” he said. “Going forward, we’re going to have to come up with another plan.”

The compromise passed out of committee but still has other steps in the House and possibly Senate.



Read the whole story
angelchrys
4 hours ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Afroman Wins: Jury Rules Mocking Cops Who Raided Your Home Is Protected Speech

1 Share

As we wrote just yesterday, the defamation trial brought by seven Adams County, Ohio deputies against rapper Afroman was going about as well for the officers as their original botched raid on his home. Today we can report the inevitable conclusion: the jury sided entirely with Afroman, clearing him of all liability after just hours of deliberation.

To recap briefly: deputies raided Afroman’s home in 2022 with guns drawn, found essentially nothing, filed no charges, broke his door (and his gate!), and got caught on his security cameras doing embarrassing things — including one deputy who appeared to cautiously eye a delicious-looking lemon pound cake. Afroman turned the footage into multiple viral music videos. The deputies, upset about being mocked, sued him for $3.9 million claiming defamation and emotional distress. The jury took just a few hours to say: nah.

The best part might be the closing argument from the officers’ attorney, who told the jury:

“Mr. Foreman doesn’t get to wrap himself in the American flag and say you can’t touch me, I can say what I want, no matter how untrue it is, no matter how much pain it causes people, because I have freedom of speech. He can’t do that.”

Afroman’s lawyer quickly responded that he can, in fact, do exactly that. That’s how the First Amendment works. Especially when talking about public officials. And then the jury agreed. This is especially delicious given that Afroman literally wrapped himself in the American flag for the entire trial, showing up each day in that wonderful suit.

Afroman’s own testimony summed up the whole case more concisely than any lawyer could:

“All of this is their fault, and they have the audacity to sue me.”

And through all of this, Afroman never stopped making music mocking these officers — right up to the trial. Here he is calling out Deputy Randy Walters:

And here he is set to the tune of the Battle Hymn of the Republic, reminding everyone that the proof of everything he’s saying is right there on the internet for anyone to see:

So the deputies sued because they were embarrassed by viral music videos, and, in doing so, created a three-day trial that generated a whole new wave of viral content about them, drew national media attention, and ended with a jury telling them they had no case. The Streisand Effect remains undefeated.

As Afroman’s lawyer told the jury in closing, citing NWA’s “Fuck Tha Police” and Richard Pryor’s comedy:

“I’m sorry they feel the way they do, but there’s a certain amount that you have to take as a public official, it’s part of the duties of the job. What chilling effect does that have on the world we live in? You don’t like what a public official does and you make a joke, and you’re dragged into court?”

There’s a serious point underneath all the absurdity. Public officials who raid your home for no good reason, find nothing, and break your stuff don’t get to then use the courts to punish you for talking about it. That’s the whole ballgame on the First Amendment, and the jury understood it perfectly.

Afroman summed it up outside the courtroom saying:

I didn’t win. America won. America still has freedom of speech. It’s still for the people, by the people!

Well said. And I hope the Adams County Sheriff’s Department is looking forward to Afroman’s next release.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
5 hours ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

ICE just added Leavenworth to its chain of detention islands. Blame a failure of moral leadership

1 Share
Protest 5 Corecivic Permit Meeting 31026 2048x1152 1

Protesters gather March 10, 2026, outside Leavenworth City Hall to encourage city commissioners to vote against a permit that allows private prison company CoreCivic to reopen in the community. (Grace Hills/Kansas Reflector)

By the time you read this, those swept up in ICE raids may already be filling some of the 1,000 beds at a troubled for-profit prison in Leavenworth now turned federal detention facility.

The last hurdle for owner CoreCivic to reopen its site was a special use permit from the city of Leavenworth and, after a year of lawsuits and community turmoil, the city finally gave in. The city commission took a final vote March 10 to grant the permit, which passed 4-1.

Commissioners in the majority attempted to excuse their votes by claiming the issue wasn’t about immigration policy but about risk and fiscal responsibility. But that’s like saying traffic laws aren’t about public safety and that you voted against putting a stoplight at a dangerous intersection because the device was too expensive and the city might be sued if it failed.

CoreCivic needed a stoplight, and the city ultimately failed to provide one.

The city commission could have denied the permit, citing concerns about widespread community opposition and a lack of confidence that CoreCivic would operate the new facility differently than the old one. It could have said trust had been broken because CoreCivic had attempted to bypass the permitting process by taking the city to court. Or it could have cited alarm that ICE detainees were being denied due process and that immigration enforcement operations were reckless, causing unjustified loss of life.

Instead, the city threw in the towel.

It was a failure of moral leadership from a city that had been in the spotlight over immigration policy. Seldom are city officials from a town of just 37,000 called upon to decide an issue of national import, but this is where Leavenworth leaders found themselves over the past year, and in the end it crushed them.

The commission vote was not just about what would happen in Leavenworth, but whether the town should contribute to the chain of detention centers — and let’s face it, concentration camps — being built across America. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn called the prisoners in the Soviet gulags of the middle 20th Century “zeks,” captives of the totalitarian state. It’s Russian slang for inmate or detainee. Our American detainees are ensnared in the growing machinery of the immigration incarceration complex. But unlike the Soviet system, the profit here isn’t in the forced labor of the zeks — the detainees themselves are dehumanized as a product for export.

ICE is set to spend $38 billion on facilities for warehousing detainees.

Leavenworth, a prison town whose name is synonymous with incarceration because of the federal penitentiary and the military maximum security barracks there, had fought CoreCivic’s attempt to reopen its prison because the company failed to apply for a special use permit and because of the facility’s history of violence and mismanagement.

There was a list of concerns about CoreCivic’s plan to reopen the facility, which in 2017 was the subject of a brutal 129-page audit by the Office of the Inspector General that found chronic understaffing and mismanagement. In 2019, CoreCivic reached a $1.45 million settlement with 539 detainees over illegal audio recordings of calls protected under attorney-client privilege. In 2021, a federal district judge described the Leavenworth prison as “an absolute hell hole” of violence and death for both inmates and guards. The facility, which opened in 1991 and was contracted by the U.S. Marshals Service, closed in January 2022 after President Joe Biden prohibited the Justice Department from contracting with private prisons.

It has remained empty but maintained by CoreCivic since then.

CoreCivic, formerly the Corrections Corporation of America, is based in Nashville and is the nation’s second largest for-profit prison company. Last year, the company announced $300 million in new ICE contracts, including one for the Leavenworth facility, now renamed the Midwest Regional Reception Center.

The Leavenworth City Commission vote came after an hour-long public comment session, in which 42 spoke against the reopening of the prison, only three spoke in favor, two individuals were arrested, and others were ejected for shouting profanities. Those arrested were Jalen Brown, 19, and Adam Meysing, 33, who were booked into the county jail on “unspecified charges” and released when fellow protestors showed up and paid their $250 bail, according to the Kansas City Star.

Two of the commissioners who voted to grant the permit did so for practical legal and business reasons, according to a report by Kansas Reflector’s Morgan Chilson.

“Everybody wants to make this morality over fiduciary responsibility,” said Commissioner Joe Wilson, “but I think there is a real risk to the future of the city … that could have long-term ramifications for our children, for our tax base, for our law enforcement and out firefighters and the services we can provide.”

Commissioner Holly Pittman said the vote wasn’t about immigration policy or politics. Pittman, a Realtor who was formerly mayor, was the target of social media attack ads by a dark money PAC, Defend US, that accused her of a progressive agenda to waste taxpayer money and lose jobs.

“It is a land use decision governed by law and by the constraints of our political authority,” Pittman said. “After reviewing all the legal framework, the zoning standards and the court rulings, I believe denying this permit would expose our taxpayers to a significant financial risk, and I will not gamble the financial stability of this city.”

Pittman said leadership doesn’t offer easy choices.

No doubt Pittman and the other council members haven’t had an easy year.

Nobody has.

We can have some sympathy for the commissioners while also recognizing that being made uncomfortable is a risk that comes with public service. They were put on the hot seat, especially when Trump’s justice department accused the city in court documents of “an aggressive and unlawful effort” to block the reopening. Sadly, Pittman and the three other council members missed turning discomfort into an historic opportunity to stand for what is right.

Would the continued fight have been expensive?

Almost certainly.

But not as expensive as the price of the civic soul.

Oh, there were modifications of the permit in an attempt to hold CoreCivic accountable. The permit would be for three years instead of five, for example, and a community oversight board was created. CoreCivic has pledged transparency and accountability. The company claims its work serves a “limited but important role” in immigration enforcement, according to its website, and that CoreCivic does not advocate for or against laws resulting in individual detentions. This does not stop the company from lobbying politicians at the federal, state, and local levels. In 2023, according to its most recent report, the company spent $2 million in political activity and lobbying.

The only commissioner to vote against the Leavenworth permit was Rebecca Hollister, who said it was difficult to trust CoreCovic given its past abuses. She said she would have preferred to send the matter back to the planning commission and shorten the permit period from three years to two.

CoreCivic officials at the meeting declined comment. Along with city officials, they were escorted out of the meeting by police through a side door to avoid an angry crowd outside shouting, “Shame!”

The company released a statement from Brian Todd, the company’s manager of public affairs:

“CoreCivic thanks the Leavenworth City Commission for their approval of the special use permit for the Midwest Regional Reception Center,” the statement read in part. “As we have from the start, CoreCivic remains committed to operating a safe, transparent and accountable facility. We look forward to our continued partnership with the city and to the benefits the MRRC will bring to Leavenworth and the surrounding communities.”

Time will tell if CoreCivic lives up to its promises, but the odds are against it. This is the same “hell hole” operator that didn’t report the death of an inmate to city police for six days and was accused of refusing to turn over to local authorities evidence, including photographs and weapons, that had been used in assaults on guards and inmates. In April of last year, I asked a CoreCivic representative about abuses at the facility. The spokesman, Ryan Gustin, talked about the importance of 300 jobs to the community but didn’t address the allegations of abuse contained in the city’s lawsuit against the company.

The United States has the highest incarceration rate per capita in the world, according to the Prison Policy Initiative. About 1% of the adult population — some 2 million people — are behind bars. Wanting to punish people is as American as baseball or apple pie, and the for-profit prison industry is willing to meet that desire without pesky, soul-searching questions about fairness or equality. While prisons are unfortunately needed for a few violent offenders, it should be government and not business that provides the cells (and not warehouses) needed. There should be no private financial incentive for incarcerating any individual, lest justice be traded for profit.

Solzhenitsyn, the Russian author and dissident I mentioned earlier, was probably the greatest authority on the subject of prison. He was arrested by the Soviet secret police for corresponding with a friend, convicted of anti-government propaganda, and spent years in the gulags. He won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970.

“The Universe has as many different centers as there are in it living beings,” Solzhenitsyn wrote in his most famous work. “Each of us is a center of creation, and the universe is shattered when they hiss at you: You are under arrest.”

Arrest, he said, is the rude knock at the door in the middle of the night, the “insolent” entrance of unwiped jackboots, the frightened civilian witnesses with hands behind their backs.

We are not at Soviet-era levels of political arrests in this country, not yet. But there have been enough examples to give alarm. There are the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents for daring to witness, the immigration sweeps that have detained scores of American citizens, the terror felt in Minnesota and elsewhere by school children of color. Federal immigration agents have become, in effect, a masked secret police. Then there is the apparatus of mass incarceration being assembled to hold 100,000 detainees.

Some communities have fought back.

Plans to turn a massive warehouse in Kansas City into a detention center were nixed after intense public opposition and legal action by the city council. A similar project was halted in Oklahoma City. But plans proceed elsewhere, including a “mega center” for 8,500 at Social Circle, Georgia.

We live in an age remarkable for a lack of moral leadership. We are now two weeks into an unprovoked war in which U.S. forces assassinated a foreign head of state and mistakenly killed 175 at an Iranian girls’ school. The rest of the list includes, but is not limited to, a lack of adequate health care for all Americans along with state-sponsored transphobia and calculated attacks on voting rights.

What does moral leadership look like?

It is John McCain’s 2017  “thumbs down” vote in the U.S. Senate that blocked repeal of the Affordable Care Act. It is the Prairie Band Potawatomi Tribe ditching an ICE contract worth $30 million because “Indian reservations were the government’s first attempts at detention centers.” It is the Helena City Commission in deep red Montana voting 4-1 on a resolution supporting immigrant communities — and stipulating that city police can ask federal agents to unmask and identify themselves.

Perhaps the vote of a city commission in a relatively small city in Kansas on a special permit may not seem to be of much significance given the challenges facing us.

Really, it is the core of the challenge.

Our democracy is made up of many interlocking centers, of city and county commissions and school boards and state legislatures and all the rest. The quality of our democracy reflects the character not just of our national leaders, but all of those local officials who make decisions on our behalf every day.

Sometimes they fail us.

Perhaps it’s because they are too scared or too weak or that they simply didn’t understand the consequences of their actions. I think that’s what happened with the Leavenworth City Commission, that they didn’t know their vote to allow a for-profit ICE detention facility was also a vote that brought us one step closer to the midnight knock on the door that might make an American zek of any of us.

Kansas Reflector is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kansas Reflector maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sherman Smith for questions: info@kansasreflector.com.

Categories: Politics
Read the whole story
angelchrys
6 hours ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

It’s official: Beloved KC-made taco shells La Tiara will come back soon

1 Share
Gladstone Food Products, maker of the beloved La Tiara taco shells, has been sold to an anonymous buyer for $10 million.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
3 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Microsoft’s Copilot Health can connect to your medical records and wearables

1 Comment
Illustration of the Microsoft Copilot logo.

Microsoft announced on Thursday that it's launching Copilot Health, a "separate, secure space" in Copilot for asking questions about lab results and medical records, searching for providers, analyzing data from wearables, and other health-related chats. The feature will have a phased rollout, so it won't be available to everyone immediately, but users can join a waitlist to get access.

Microsoft says Copilot Health "doesn't replace your doctor" and isn't intended for providing medical diagnoses or treatment, but rather helping users understand their health data. Users can import medical records from over 50,000 US hospitals and healthcare …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
7 days ago
reply
So very much nope
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories