I am the Queen of Awesome. My words do not represent my employer, but I bet you already knew that.
18744 stories
·
35 followers

ICE Nativity scenes: Churches reimagine Christmas story amid deportations

1 Comment and 2 Shares

(RNS) — At first glance, the Nativity scene outside Lake Street Church in Evanston, Illinois, has all the traditional hallmarks: Figures resembling Mary and Joseph stand near a baby Jesus, who rests in a manger.

But this year, the details are decidedly different. For starters, Mary and Joseph are wearing gas masks. Jesus, who typically is depicted lying in hay, is instead nestled in a reflective blanket often used by immigrants in detention, with his hands bound with zip ties. And behind the family stands three Roman centurions wearing vests with a very modern label: ICE, or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The Rev. Michael Woolf, senior minister at the church, said the Nativity was meant to reference the recent influx of ICE into Chicago and the surrounding area as part of President Donald Trump’s ongoing mass deportation effort. The pastor noted Department of Homeland Security agents have tear-gassed protesters in the area and that locals reported seeing children among those detained with zip ties by federal agents during a recent high-profile immigration raid in a nearby apartment building. DHS has denied the latter claim, although evidence of similar actions has been reported elsewhere.

“We know that Jesus was born into a Roman imperial occupation, and pretty much immediately becomes a refugee in Egypt, has to flee and faces political violence,” he said. “So we have to ask: what would it be like if Jesus were born here today?”

The Nativity is one of multiple immigration-themed religious displays that have popped up in different parts of the country in recent weeks, with at least one live-action depiction of Christ’s birth slated to take place outside an ICE facility later this month. Amid rising faith-based pushback to Trump’s mass-deportation campaign, religious leaders say they are hoping to make the Christmas story relevant to modern believers by recalling the dire circumstances faced by Jesus and his parents as recounted in the gospels.

Churchgoers at Saint Susanna Parish in Dedham, Massachusetts, recently erected a similar immigration-themed Nativity just outside their building. The display includes traditional depictions of the magi, stable animals and other figures, but the banner above reads “Peace on Earth?” And propped up in the center of the arrangement, where Mary, Joseph and Jesus would normally appear, sits a sign that reads: “ICE was here.”

A Nativity outside Saint Susanna Parish in Dedham, Massachusetts. (Photo courtesy of the Rev. Steve Josoma)

The sign, in smaller font, notes that “the Holy Family is safe inside The Sanctuary of Our Church.” But it goes on to encourage viewers to call a local immigration justice hotline if they see ICE officers.

The Rev. Steve Josoma, the priest at Saint Susanna, said he understands some people would rather have “a nice little place for baby Jesus and his family to celebrate Christmas” and “leave it at that.” But he argued religious art should engage the viewer.

“It’s not supposed to be something that you look at and admire,” he said. “It’s supposed to challenge you, to move you, to help you see things differently, to maybe force some questions that you know need to be answered.”

He added: “I think Pope Francis used to always say, if you want to hear God, you’ve got to go to the margins of life, in the stables and with the shepherds. You couldn’t get more to the margins of life.”

Woolf and Josoma said their churches have erected Nativity scenes with political themes in the past, touching on the treatment of Palestinians in Gaza or past immigration debates. But while those displays garnered media attention and even criticism, the clergymen suggested blowback to their latest efforts has been more intense — especially after Fox News host Sean Hannity dedicated an entire segment of his show to condemning Lake Street’s Nativity scene.

“A woke church set up a truly horrifying Nativity scene,” Hannity said on his show. “I guess the war on Christmas is back, isn’t it?”

Hannity’s guest, Allie Beth Stuckey, decried the display as “blasphemy.” Stuckey, a conservative author, has garnered a following in certain far-right circles this year, particularly for her argument that Christians can be misled into embracing “toxic empathy” for immigrants.

After Fox and other conservative media outlets picked up the display, Woolf said his church has received an avalanche of calls — many supportive, but others decidedly not.

“There’s been some suggestions that I should kill myself,” Woolf said.

Josoma reported a similar influx of messages.

“You get a lot of support, but as it goes on, most — not all, but most — of the negative ones aren’t really conversational,” he said. “They’re just swearing and yelling.”

Yet the displays follow months of public — and often confrontational — faith-based pushback to Trump’s mass-deportation effort. Pope Leo, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and clergy from a range of traditions have spoken out against the administration’s immigration agenda throughout 2025, with some denominations even filing lawsuits challenging the government’s policies. Faith leaders have been injured after being shot with non-lethal pepper balls and pepper rounds while demonstrating outside ICE facilities, and others have even been arrested — including Woolf, who became a fixture on social media last month when an image of him being detained by police outside an ICE building went viral.

The same faith-fueled movement is inspiring another immigration-themed Nativity scene on Christmas Eve, this time featuring real-life participants. The Rev. Dave Woessner, an Episcopal priest and congregational coordinator with the Massachusetts Council of Churches, said his team is organizing a Christmas worship service outside of an ICE facility in Burlington that will feature a real-life recreation of Jesus’ birth — including, potentially, a donkey.

“It is a full Christian worship service celebrating Christmas, telling the story of Jesus’ birth, and telling the story of the Holy Family as a refugee family,” Woessner said. “We celebrate knowing that our Savior comes into the world as a person who is oppressed, a person who is persecuted and fleeing government violence into a family that is under the thumb of tyranny and empire. Yet God comes into the world — the light of the world comes into the darkness.”

Woessner, who works with communities impacted by deportation efforts, said he and others have convened a weekly vigil outside the ICE facility for 33 weeks straight. The faith leaders have also attempted to accompany immigrants who are appearing for ICE check-ins, but have been repeatedly denied. At least one immigrant Woessner accompanied to the building’s door, he said, entered the building and was promptly deported.

The Massachusetts Council of Churches is also a plaintiff in one of the faith-led lawsuits against the Trump administration, challenging the government’s decision to rescind an internal policy that discouraged immigration raids at churches and other “sensitive locations.”

Asked if they coordinated efforts or even spoke with each other about their immigration-themed religious displays, the three pastors said no. But none expressed surprise that Nativity scenes criticizing ICE would become popular this season.

“We’re learning from Christ’s story so that we can see more clearly how that is playing out in our midst today,” Woessner said.

Read the whole story
acdha
19 hours ago
reply
“So we have to ask: what would it be like if Jesus were born here today?”
Washington, DC
angelchrys
8 hours ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Johnson County book, plant shop reopens after fire forced months-long closure

1 Share
Monstera’s Books, located at 7930 Floyd St. in Overland Park, reopened on Dec. 6, 2025 after a fire at a restaurant in a neighboring building forced the book store to undergo renovations.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
1 day ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Adding to an “overwhelming body of evidence”, a recent study showed that...

1 Share
Adding to an “overwhelming body of evidence”, a recent study showed that “suicidality scores dropped significantly an average of two years and up to five years after [trans youth] received gender-affirming treatment”.
Read the whole story
angelchrys
7 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Zillow property listings no longer show risk of fires, floods, and storms

1 Comment

Zillow has stopped publishing climate risk ratings for sales listings that show the likelihood of properties being impacted by extreme weather, The New York Times reports. The feature introduced by the real estate listings site last year used data from risk-modeling company First Street to forecast which homes are most vulnerable to floods, wildfires, wind, extreme heat, and poor air quality, as climate conditions pose an increasing risk to properties.

The change came into effect earlier this month following complaints from the California Regional Multiple Listing Service (CRMLS) regarding the accuracy of First Street’s risk models. “Displaying the probability of a specific home flooding this year or within the next five years can have a significant impact on the perceived desirability of that property,” Art Carter, CRMLS chief executive officer, told The NYT.

Sales listings on Zillow now link users to First Street’s website instead, where they can manually find climate risk scores for specific properties. First Street data shows that millions more properties are at risk of flooding compared to government estimates.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
7 days ago
reply
Unfettered capitalism sure is something to watch
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Idiocracy and Somebody Else’s Problem

1 Share

There are a couple of topics in pop culture that I shouldn’t have strong opinions about, and yet I do. And every time they come back up, the impulse of I disagree with someone on the internet overwhelms my ability to fight back. One of them is that “Baby It’s Cold Outside” is not a Christmas song about sexual harassment, actually, and that’s a hill I will most likely die on.

The other is how Idiocracy isn’t actually about eugenics. In fact, it says the exact opposite of the thing that people most often complain that it’s about.

I saw this mentioned yesterday, and my first response was to helpfully direct the person to the Source of All Human Knowledge, this blog, where I already addressed the issue directly and decisively.

The problem with that post is that it’s unnecessarily argumentative, and I just come across like a big jerk. But while I was trying to formulate a less asinine and arrogant way to explain it, I realized that this not-particularly-insightful movie somehow just keeps getting more relevant to me. In fact, I think I was defending the movie while still not fully understanding the extent of what the movie was saying.

(Not to mention going off on a tangential tirade against “explainer” videos and the like, while I was attempting to give the definitive explanation of a movie).

Idiocracy comes right out of the gate with a narrator explaining its “problematic” premise: high IQ people stop having children, while low IQ people have too many children, which eventually results in a complete breakdown of society. We see a far-off dystopian future where everyone is obsessed with consumerism, vulgarity, inanity, all the worst aspects of 21st century society, magnified by thousands.

But it also comes right out of the gate mocking its own premise. The “high IQ” couple we’re shown at the beginning, who put off having children for the sake of their careers, eventually discovering its too late for them to have kids, are awful people. Irredeemably self-obsessed, focused on keeping up appearances, surrounded by increasingly ostentatious displays of conspicuous consumption.

They are absolutely not presented as models of proper society. And (slightly) more subtly: their offense isn’t that they’re not having “enough” children, since it’s clear they’d be pretty bad parents.

At the same time, we’re shown the “low IQ” family, who’ve had several children and are expecting more, and their lives are absolute chaos. Just like with the couple, their IQs are displayed clearly on screen.

Ever since I first saw the movie, I always took this to be an example of its absurd, lowbrow comedy and its broad, shotgun approach to satire: just say everything sucks, and eventually you’ll hit the right target. What I didn’t appreciate is that it was mocking its own premise, as it was presenting its premise. It was showing how absurd it would be to look at these two families and assume that the key differentiator between them was something as arbitrary as their relative IQs.

I guess that itself is part of the satire? Say something confidently enough, delivered with an authoritative narrator voice, and people — including me — won’t think too hard about it?

In any case, that’s really what the entirety of the movie is about, rejecting its own stated premise. The protagonists, played by Luke Wilson and Maya Rudolph, are the most thoroughly average man the army could find for its experiment, and a woman that they presume no one would expect anything from because she’s a prostitute.

When they reach the future, everyone either looks to him for leadership, or rejects him for “sounding gay,” because he’s so smart. Several times, characters treat him like a genius because his IQ is so unbelievably high. President Camacho himself looks to him for guidance, because his genius plan for saving America’s crops is to irrigate them with water instead of an energy drink. And that’s enough to qualify him for President of the United States.

He and Rita have the solutions everyone is seeking, not because they’re brilliant or even exceptional, but just because they use common sense. It’s certainly nothing that’s attributable to IQ, and certainly not to genetics.

Characters keep saying how smart they must be, on account of their high IQs, but these are the same people who’ve made “Ow! My Balls!” the most popular show on television.

To interpret Idiocracy as having any kind of “pro-eugenics” message requires believing that it says everything it has to say in the first 10 minutes or so, and then does nothing but riff on that for the rest of its run time. It means believing that a movie can’t introduce an absurd premise specifically for the purpose of mocking that premise.

So if I’m so confident as to what Idiocracy isn’t saying, then what is it actually saying? Honestly, for a long time, I assumed that it wasn’t saying much of anything. It was a broad, cynical-to-nihilistic satirical comedy, making fun of how much society is intent on dumbing itself down, but not offering anything resembling a solution.

As much as I’m annoyed by people using the movie as shorthand for the most vapid social commentary — I bet they didn’t intend Idiocracy to become a documentary, am I right?! — I have to admit that it wasn’t until I became so thoroughly disillusioned by the past two years that I was able to get a handle on everything it’s saying.

It’s overtly a snobs vs slobs movie, one that so thoroughly eviscerates the slobs that it’s easy to miss the fact that it’s mocking the snobs at the same time. I guess it’s easy to misunderstand satire if you’re one of its targets.

Ultimately, it’s a populist movie. And one of the things that’s been bugging me over the past several years has been how thoroughly political commentators have turned “populist” into a dirty word. Not overtly as the attempts to redefine “woke” and “diversity,” but no less effective.

In terms of party specifics: the GOP have been ham-fisted in their attempts to pit their mythical ideal of a “middle American” against the “coastal elites,” setting up an environment where the Democrats have been able to pull off One Weird Trick: they’ve spun attacks on the “elite” into attacks on the establishment, if not attacks on the very notion of expertise. Attacks which me must help defend against, with our votes and our donations.

Which means now, we’ve got a Democratic party that effectively appoints its own successors, since they control whether we even hear about candidates, much less get the chance to vote for them. And any time anyone with a genuinely progressive viewpoint comes forward — or hell, even centrists who are good public speakers, like Buttigieg — it’s treated as this radical outlying idea, instead of basic common sense.

Back to Idiocracy: the thing that ends up solving the crisis isn’t high IQ, or social class, or expertise, or anything that would make Luke Wilson’s character exceptional. It’s just common sense. So if you’re offended or made uneasy at the movie’s suggestion that something as arbitrary as IQ scores, or even worse, the idea that intelligence is inherited — good! You’re supposed to be offended by that. It means you’re at least part way towards appreciating how offensive it is to suggest that having the right people in charge and making all the decisions is the only thing keeping us from total societal collapse.

I mercifully don’t actually remember much about 2006, so maybe I’m being over-charitable to the movie, and it actually was just supposed to be nothing more than a reaction to the Bush administration, lamenting how awful it was to have stupid people in charge. But regardless of the intent, I think what keeps Idiocracy feeling so relevant isn’t just that we keep putting stupid people in charge, but that we seem to be oblivious to the real causes of our problems.

We’ll do just about anything — from blaming marginalized groups, to inventing bullshit theories about natural aptitude or eugenics, to rooting for charismatic politicians who’ll swoop in and Fix All the Problems — to avoid treating the path to progress as something as simple as common sense and collective responsibility. As I remember it, the characters in the dystopian future of Idiocracy weren’t just stupid, but willfully stupid. Lazy, easily distracted, obsessed with consumerism, and eager to look to other people for answers. It’s a society built on the philosophy of “not my problem.”

Which is relatable, when you’re in a system that seems to have been designed to keep us feeling disenfranchised and powerless. But maybe it really is as simple as recognizing that common sense has nothing to do with intelligence and sure as hell doesn’t have anything to do with genetics.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
7 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

All of the Rivers

1 Share

Perhaps inspired by All Streets, Ben Fry’s map of all the streets in the US, Nelson Minar built a US map out of all the rivers in the country.

All Rivers

All Rivers detail

Minar put all the data and files he used up on Github so you can make your own version.

[This is a vintage post originally from Jun 2013.]

Tags: Ben Fry · maps · Nelson Minar · timeless posts · USA

Read the whole story
angelchrys
12 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories