I am the Queen of Awesome. My words do not represent my employer, but I bet you already knew that.
18509 stories
·
35 followers

‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine

2 Shares
‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine

I’ve been videochatting with Mixæl Swan Laufer for about 30 minutes about an exciting discovery when he points out that to date, the best way he’s been able to bring attention to his organization is “the old school method of me performing a bunch of federal felonies on stage in front of a bunch of people.”

I stop him and ask: “In this case, what are the felonies?” 

“Well, the list is pretty long,” he said. 

Laufer is the chief spokesperson of Four Thieves Vinegar Collective, an anarchist collective that has spent the last few years teaching people how to make DIY versions of expensive pharmaceuticals at a tiny fraction of the cost. Four Thieves Vinegar Collective call what they do “right to repair for your body.” 

Laufer has become well known for handing out DIY pills and medicines at hacking conferences, which include, for example, courses of the abortion drug misoprostol that can be manufactured for 89 cents (normal cost: $160) and which has become increasingly difficult to obtain in some states following the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs. 

In our call, Laufer had just explained that Four Thieves’ had made some miscalculations as part of its latest project, to create instructions for replicating sofosbuvir (Sovaldi), a miracle drug that cures hepatitis C, which he planned to explain and reveal at the DEF CON hacking conference. 

Unlike many other drugs that treat viruses, Sovaldi does not suppress hepatitis C, a virus that kills roughly 250,000 people around the world each year. It cures it.

“Normally you have a virus, and your body fights it off or your body fights it to a standstill and you just have it forever, basically, and hope it remains dormant more or less,” Laufer said. “The holy grail for every virologist is to find a way to drain the viral reservoir, and Sovaldi does this. You take one pill of Sovaldi a day for 12 weeks and then you don’t have hepatitis C anymore.” 

The problem is that those pills are under patent, and they cost $1,000 per pill. 

“Literally, if you have $84,000 then hepatitis C is not your problem anymore,” Laufer said. “But given that there are other methodologies for managing hepatitis C that are not curing it and that are cheaper, insurance typically will not cover [Sovaldi]. And so we’ve got this incredible technology and it’s sitting on the shelf except for people who are ridiculously wealthy.”

‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine
Laufer with a DIY card of the abortion drug Miso

So Four Thieves Vinegar Collective set out to teach people how to make their own version of Sovaldi. Chemists at the collective thought the DIY version would cost about $300 for the entire course of medication, or about $3.57 per pill. But they were wrong. 

“It’s actually just a little under $70 (83 cents per pill), which just kind of blew my mind when they finally showed me the results,” Laufer said. “I was like, can we do the math here again?”   

I have been familiar with Four Thieves Vinegar Collective’s work since 2018, when I edited a (fantastic) feature about Laufer and the collective written by Daniel Oberhaus at Motherboard. At the time, Four Thieves had figured out how to make EpiPens and Daraprim—an HIV medication controlled at the time by “pharma bro” Martin Shkreli—for far below what they cost in the United States. Daniel began that article with a description of Laufer “throwing thousands of dollars worth of homemade medicine into a packed audience at Hackers on Planet Earth, a biennial conference in New York City.” 

Six years later, Laufer’s promotional tactics are largely the same. “It’s very vague,” he said when I asked him to list out the felonies he thought he’d be committing at DEF CON. “I’ll be on stage, handing out drugs that I made, that are under patent and not owned by me or licensed to me. When the moment comes, the list of things they can come after me with is very long because of how vaguely most of these laws are written.” 

Crucially, unlike other medical freedom organizations, Four Thieves isn’t suggesting people treat COVID with Ivermectin, isn’t shilling random supplements, and doesn’t have any sort of commercial arm at all. Instead, they are helping people to make their own, identical pirated versions of proven and tested pharmaceuticals by taking the precursor ingredients and performing the chemical reactions to make the medication themselves.

“We don’t invent anything, really,” Laufer said. “We take things that are on the shelf and hijack them. We like to take something established, and be like ‘This works, but you can’t get it.’ Well, here’s a way to get it.” 

A slide at his talk reads “Isn’t this illegal? Yeah. Grow up.” 

“I am of the firm belief that we are hitting a watershed where economics and morality are coming to a head, like, ‘Look: intellectual property law is based off some ideas that came out of 1400s Venice. They’re not applicable and they’re being abused and people are dying every day because of it, and it’s not OK,’” Laufer told me.

‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine
The Microlab

Four Thieves’ work has resonated with me since I learned about it from Daniel’s article, in part because I have seen firsthand how patents owned by Big Pharma and the American healthcare industrial complex hurt and kill people in their cold machinations. In my early 20s, I watched my best friend have to forgo several different treatments for cystic fibrosis because she couldn’t afford them or because the medication was not available in the U.S. She died when she was 25. 

At the time, a miracle drug called Kalydeco had recently been approved for use on some patients with cystic fibrosis. It cost $311,000 per patient, per year. The article I wrote about my friend’s life and how it was difficult for me to not blame the American medical system was the most emotionally difficult I’ve ever written, and even now, years later, it is hard to talk about.

On the phone with Laufer, I told him about what happened to my friend. He started typing while I was talking to him. “K-A-L-Y-D-E-C-O,” I spelled out for him.

“What? This is a nothing molecule,” he said, pulling up the molecular structure of the drug on Wikipedia. “Look. You’ve got two benzine rings, an NH here, a second ring with an alcohol here, and then two ammonias coming off of it. I mean, that’s so fucked. Like, you can I could make that in a weekend.” 

‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine
The Microlab at DEF CON

For the next 15 minutes, Laufer showed me how someone would theoretically make a DIY version of Kalydeco using Four Thieves’ tools. The heart of what Four Thieves has built is called Chemhacktica, a forked version of an MIT-DARPA project called ASKOS that uses machine learning to map out chemical pathways for molecule synthesis, and to suggest potential chemical reactions that would yield the molecule that you want to make. Chemhacktica is a piece of software that allows users to input the desired molecule, and it will show “possible synthesis plans,” will suggest precursor materials and will search a database to see whether it is buyable, and will show what the potential chemical reactions might look like, among other features.

Another core piece of technology Four Thieves has created and open sourced is the Microlab, an “open source jacketed lab reactor made from off-the-shelf components you can buy online.” 

The Microlab is the lab equipment (called a controlled lab reactor or CLR) that you use to actually make medicine, using the suggested reaction pathways given by Chemhacktica. Costs for the materials to build this are between $300 and $500, depending on the features you want. Four Thieves has released detailed instructions about how to build and use the Microlab, as well as software that will make it run.

“A CLR is to organic chemistry what an espresso machine is to coffee. It is possible to make coffee over an open fire with nothing more than beans, water, and a tin can,” Four Thieves explains on its website. “But you will get a better, more consistent cup of coffee from an automatic machine that dispenses the right amount of water at the right temperature in such a way that ensures the water is in contact with the grounds for the right amount of time.”

The Microlab “won’t do every single step for you,” they say. But “the Microlab is designed to load a recipe for a chemical reaction, then automate the temperature control, reagent addition, and stirring that are needed. It is designed for small-molecule organic chemistry to make certain medicinal compounds in your own home or workshop.”

‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine
Chemhacktica showing how the process of making sofosbuvir would work

Four Thieves has also released the Apothecarium, a drag-and-drop recipe system that Laufer explains as “how you generate a file that the Microlab will run,” and which gives step-by-step instructions on how to make specific medications. 

Releasing the Microlab and its software is an iterative process that Four Thieves has been working on for years, and the latest version, called .6, was released just a few weeks ago.

“It’s a new version that is very well-documented, and easier to build, and simpler in its implementation,” Laufer said. “It does everything I was dreaming of, in a way, which is, I mean, you see me smiling. I’m just amazed at all the people I get to work with and what they do.”

On the call, Laufer inputs the Kalydeco molecule into Chemhacktica and waits for the program to run.

“All right, here’s your reaction,” he says, showing me the screen. Laufer explains that both precursors needed to make Kalydeco are available commercially, and that one costs $1 per gram and the other costs $28 per gram. He checks the daily dosage (roughly 300 mg per day), and Chemhacktica spits out a potential yield. He explains that, in back-of-the-envelope math, “me, a non-chemist doing a first pass,” Kalydeco could be made “in the range of $10 a day for raw materials.” When Kalydeco was first introduced, it cost roughly $820 per patient per day.

I tell Laufer more about my friend, and about how she sometimes couldn’t afford basic medications during periods when she lost her health insurance. I explained that some treatments she wanted to try were approved for use in other countries, but not in the United States. Laufer explains that, over the years, he’s learned about so many different medications for so many different types of diseases that are either very expensive or very hard to get. 

“There are so many of these that fall into this unbelievable fucking category, where it would just take nothing to make it,” he said. “Everybody’s got a story like this, and it’s just so heartbreaking and it never gets easier … we do have happy stories, and they keep us going, but there’s a lot of heartbreakers.” 

At DEF CON, Laufer begins his talk by explaining that, a few years ago, he had a mystery illness that caused him to lose his hair and shed layers of his skin. Ultimately, he had a tumor removed.

“I don't know who needs to hear this but I'm scared too all the time of losing the health that I have. I know what it feels like,” he says. “I know what it feels like to not know what's wrong with your body and to have to go shop for a stranger who has the authority to maybe or maybe not give you what you need. I know what it feels like to know what's wrong with your body and to know what you need and to be told you can't have it because the infrastructure has failed and it's not available.”

“This is wrong,” he says. “And I hope to show you all some tools so that it doesn’t ever have to happen again … most medications, you can make a better, cheaper version of, yourself, at home.”

Throughout his talk, Laufer explains how Four Thieves was able to make cheaper versions of Daraprim, the epipen, and abortion medication. 

“Daraprim is still $750 per 50mg pill,” his presentation slides say. He holds up a full pill bottle of DIY Daraprim that he made for $80. “You want it? I’ll toss it out.” He tosses it into the audience. 

Then, Laufer explains how the collective was able to make sofosbuvir to treat Hepatitis C at an enormously cheaper price than Gilead, which makes Sovaldi. He pulls up a photo of Daniel O’Day, the CEO of Gilead, and says he has obtained O’Day’s phone number. He calls the number on stage. A woman answers.

“This is Dr. Mixæl Laufer. I’m calling from Four Thieves. He’s expecting my call,” he says. The woman goes to grab O’Day. O’Day answers the phone. “I don’t know how you got my number but please don’t call again.” He hangs up.

“Well, I tried,” Laufer tells the crowd. 

Later in the talk, he details how the team made sofosbuvir and pressed it into a small pill. He pulls some out, and hands them to members of the crowd. He shows the crowd testing Four Thieves did to show that the pills they made are, chemically, the same as Sovaldi. He takes out a pill, swallows it on stage, and pumps his fist. 

‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine
Laufer showing Sovaldi, and Four Thieves' version of sofosbuvir
‘Right to Repair for Your Body’: The Rise of DIY, Pirated Medicine
Laufer swallowing a pill of Four Thieves' sofosbuvir at DEF CON

After his talk, I told Laufer that I got the sense that he actually wanted to talk to O’Day, and didn’t just want to yell at him. “I would have been interested to hear more of his perspective, because I am of the general impression that most people in most situations do what they do because they think it’s the right thing,” Laufer told me. “When you find someone doing something you think is really wrong, they’re usually dealing with a different set of assumptions and logical structure than you are. It’s not that there’s no logic. Usually people have thought it through and their manner of thought is different than yours.”

“If the science [of Big Pharma] didn’t work, I wouldn’t care what they fucking charged,” Laufer said. “The point is the science works and people can’t get it. There’s often this ‘good guy, bad guy, black-and-white disconnect that happens in the rhetoric. And I’m like, ‘No, pharmaceutical science is amazing. That’s the whole point.”

Laufer’s point is that the research that goes into making a new drug is hard, but that actually producing some of these medications after they’ve been invented is sometimes easy and inexpensive. Charging astronomical prices to people who are dying is immoral, and Four Thieves seeks to normalize the idea of making some types of medicine yourself. 

“Most people kind of cower,” he says at Def Con. “Chemistry seems hard. It seems like a specialized thing. Well, sure, if you’re doing research chemistry, that’s why there’s a PhD in it. Of course. But if you just need to operate it, similar to the difference between building a computer, and using a computer, it’s significantly easier.”

On the call, Laufer told me that, “for the first time, we are possibly at least within striking distance of our ultimate goal of being able to disband as an organization.”

“Our ultimate hope is to get to a point where we’re no longer necessary because the notion of DIY medicine, no matter anybody’s opinion of it is common enough that if it comes up in conversation, someone can say ‘Oh I’m just going to 3D print a replacement,’” he said. “Or, you know ‘there’s this migraine medication that I like, can’t get a prescription for, and it’s so expensive,’ and someone says ‘just try making that.’ I want to get to where that sort of exchange is common.”

“I can’t tell people that they should use what we make, because I don’t think that’s morally defensible,” he said. “We develop things that we think are a good idea, and the tools to make them. We leave them on the table and people can use them or not, but we’re never going to push it. I would much rather the world be like ‘We thought about this really carefully, and capitalism is here to stay.’ If people decide for themselves that ‘Look, the infrastructure does abuse us, but this is the system we like, and we like it better.’ If that’s the way it breaks, that’s the way it breaks.”

Read the whole story
angelchrys
3 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Animal Crossing mobile shuts down in November but will live on in new app

1 Share
Nintendo’s Animal Crossing: Pocket camp running on a smartphone.
You don’t have to go home, but you can’t camp here. | Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

Seven years after launching on iOS and Android, Nintendo has announced that online service for Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp will be ending on November 28th at 11AM ET.

In a statement today, Nintendo assured current players they would still be able to fully enjoy the game for three more months. “We will continue to hold events and add items until the service-end date.”

In addition to the game shutting down on November 28th, Leaf Tickets (which could be used to expedite the building of campsite accessories) will no longer be available for purchase starting on November 27th. As of October 28th, new monthly Pocket Camp Club subscriptions will also no longer be accepted, and existing subscriptions to all three tiers will no longer automatically renew.

November won’t be the permanent end of the trail for Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp. Nintendo has assured players that their save data can be carried over to a new version of the game currently in development by linking their Nintendo accounts. The company doesn’t plan to reveal the new version until sometime in October but shared a few details today. The new Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp will be a “paid app without in-app purchases” and will not require a constant internet connection to be played.

The announcement is part of Nintendo’s slow shift away from mobile. After the success of the Nintendo DS and the Wii, with many gamers migrating to smartphones, Nintendo did the same. In 2015, it released its first mobile game, Miitomo, which was followed by more ambitious apps like Super Mario Run in 2016, Fire Emblem: Heroes and Pocket Camp in 2017, and Mario Kart Tour in 2019.

The past five years haven’t seen much of anything from Nintendo for iOS or Android, but at least the company isn’t shutting down Pocket Camp entirely and leaving paying players with nothing, like it did when it shut down its free-to-play mobile game Dragalia Lost.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
15 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

Trolling the Troll

3 Shares
Pout harder [Photo credit: Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS]

Subscribe now

Americans have known for a while that my uncle has the thinnest skin on the planet. We now know that Vice President Kamala Harris is all the way under it because Donald keeps admitting it.

“I’m very angry at her,” Donald said Thursday. “I think I’m entitled to personal attacks. I don’t have a lot of respect for her. I don’t have a lot of respect for her intelligence, and I think she’ll be a terrible president.” 

Donald can’t handle losing, but losing to a Black woman is particularly hard for him to bear. Harris’s campaign team deserves a lot of credit for understanding just how to put pressure on Donald’s very fragile psyche. Their rapid-response and press teams are running an edgy presidential campaign that is unique, as far as I know, in modern American political history. It’s the kind of approach that both highlights and exacerbates Donald’s weaknesses. It also makes it impossible for Donald to stay on message and stay away from the kind of personal attacks that his advisors are desperate for him to drop because they’re endangering his reelection bid.

Donald’s narcissistic injury is so great that he has essentially stopped campaigning in swing states. Multiple reports say that he can’t control his impulses in private. He continues to be furious that he’s no longer running against President Biden. More than anything, he perseverates about crowd sizes—both publicly and privately.

Sensing its advantage, just a few hours before Donald’s pathetic attempt to reclaim the spotlight by holding another staged event, the Harris campaign put out a media advisory, but not just any media advisory:

“TODAY: Donald Trump To Ramble Incoherently and Spread Dangerous Lies in Public, but at Different Home. TODAY at 4:30 p.m. — Donald J. Trump, loser of the 2020 election by 7 million votes, will hold another public meltdown in Bedminster, New Jersey.”

That’s quality trolling. It’s was also pretty prescient. 

For so many years, Democrats have taken the high road (remember “When they go low, we go high?”). Unfortunately, Donald and the Republican Party have gone lower than most people thought possible.

So, we’re not “going high” any more. What the Harris and Walz ticket understands is that the best way to take down a bully with the kind of power Donald Trump has, the kind of unimaginable power he hopes to seize, is to mock him and encourage others to laugh at him.

“She actually called me weird,” Donald whined Thursday. “‘He’s weird.’ And it was just a soundbite. And she called JD and I weird. He’s not weird.” Methinks thou dost protest too much. Also, cry harder.

It’s a disjointed and rattled response from a clearly unwell man. Harris and Walz, on the other hand, are running a joyful, cohesive campaign. And while the joy they have brought to this race has been widely discussed, the effect that joy has on Donald hasn’t. It’s his kryptonite because he doesn’t understand it, he doesn’t know how to generate for himself or for his campaign, and it causes him pain. He has no idea how to combat the fact that he’s losing, so he engages in more cruelty. And so the cycle continues, and he continues to get worse.

The Harris campaign is happy to help. I want to note, however, that it’s not only getting under Donald’s skin that’s going to propel Harris to win this race; it’s the contrast between the campaigns.

Examples one, on Friday, while speaking at her economic policy rollout in North Carolina, Harris remarked that she used to work at McDonald’s. Donald had a million dollars by the time he was a year old.

Example two, the Harris campaign recently sent out a fundraising email in which the Vice President talked about how she felt on Election Night 2016.

It was incredibly bittersweet. When I took the stage for my acceptance speech—to represent California in the Senate—I tore up my notes. I just said, ‘We will fight.’ Then I went home and I sat on the couch with a family-sized bag of nacho Doritos. I did not share one chip with anybody. Not even Doug. I just watched the TV with utter shock and dismay.

That may be one of the most relatable things a candidate has ever said. I challenge anybody to come up with a comparable moment of honesty and vulnerability from Donald Trump.

Kamala Harris isn’t afraid of Donald, and her campaign reflects that. But Kamala Harris also isn’t afraid to be herself, and her campaign reflects that, too.

Subscribe now

Read the whole story
angelchrys
21 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
acdha
21 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Good Guy Adam August

2 Shares

Read the whole story
angelchrys
24 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
zippy72
24 days ago
reply
FourSquare, qv
Share this story
Delete

The Steampunk Clocks of 19th-Century Paris: Discover the Ingenious System That Revolutionized Timekeeping in the 1880s

1 Share

A middle-class Parisian living around the turn of the twentieth century would have to budget for services like not just water or gas, but also time. Though electric clocks had been demonstrated, they were still a high-tech rarity; installing one in the home would have been completely out of the question. If you wanted to synchronize timekeeping across an entire major city, it made more sense to use a proven, reliable, and much cheaper infrastructure: pipes full of compressed air. Paris’ pneumatic postal system had been in service since 1866, and in 1877, Vienna had demonstrated that the same basic technology could be used to run clocks.

“The idea was to have a master clock in the center of Paris that would send out a pulse each minute to synchronize every clock around the city,” writes Ewan Cunningham at Primal Nebula, on a companion page to the Primal Space video above.

“The clocks wouldn’t have to be powered, the bursts of air would simply move all the clocks in the system forward at the same time. As for the master clock itself, it was kept in time by “another super accurate clock that was updated daily using observations of stars and planets” at the Paris Observatory. Just five years after its first implementation in 1880, this system had made possible the installation of thousands of “Popp clocks” (named for its Austrian inventor Victor Popp) in “hotels, train stations, houses, schools and public streets.”

alt

In 1881, the visiting engineer Jules Albert Berly wrote of these “numerous clocks standing on graceful light iron pillars in the squares, at the corners of streets, and in other conspicuous positions about the city,” also noting those “throughout their hotels were, what is unusual with hotel clocks, keeping accurate time.” Apart from the great flood of 1910, which “stopped time” across Paris, this pneumatic time-keeping system seems to have remained in steady service for nearly half a century, until its discontinuation in 1927. But even now, nearly a century late, some of the sites where Popp clocks once stood are still identifiable — and thus worthy sites of pilgrimage for steampunk fans everywhere.

Related Content:

Paris Had a Moving Sidewalk in 1900, and a Thomas Edison Film Captured It in Action

How Big Ben Works: A Detailed Look Inside London’s Beloved Victorian Clock Tower

The Clock That Changed the World: How John Harrison’s Portable Clock Revolutionized Sea Navigation in the 18th Century

Clocks Around the World: How Other Languages Tell Time

How Clocks Changed Humanity Forever, Making Us Masters and Slaves of Time

Watch Scenes from Belle Époque Paris Vividly Restored with Artificial Intelligence (Circa 1890)

Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. His projects include the Substack newsletter Books on Cities and the book The Stateless City: a Walk through 21st-Century Los Angeles. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.

Read the whole story
angelchrys
25 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

The US government wants to make it easier for you to click the 'unsubscribe' button | AP News

1 Comment and 3 Shares

WASHINGTON (AP) — In the name of consumer protection, a slew of U.S. federal agencies are working to make it easier for Americans to click the unsubscribe button for unwanted memberships and recurring payment services.

A broad new government initiative, dubbed “Time Is Money,” includes a rollout of new regulations and the promise of more for industries spanning from healthcare and fitness memberships to media subscriptions.

“The administration is cracking down on all the ways that companies, through paperwork, hold times and general aggravation waste people’s money and waste people’s time and really hold onto their money,” Neera Tanden, White House domestic policy adviser, told reporters Friday in advance of the announcement.

“Essentially in all of these practices, companies are delaying services to you or really trying to make it so difficult for you to cancel the service that they get to hold onto your money for longer and longer,” Tanden said. “These seemingly small inconveniences don’t happen by accident — they have huge financial consequences.”

Efforts being rolled out Monday include a new Federal Communications Commission inquiry into whether to impose requirements on communications companies that would make it as easy to cancel a subscription or service as it was to sign up for one.

The Federal Trade Commission in March 2023 initiated “click to cancel” rulemaking requiring companies to let customers end subscriptions as easily as they started them.

Also Monday, the heads of the departments of Labor and of Health and Human Services are asking health insurance companies and group health plans to make improvements to customer interactions with their health coverage, and “in the coming months will identify additional opportunities to improve consumers’ interactions with the health care system,” according to a White House summary.

The government already has launched several initiatives aimed at improving the consumer experience.

In October, the FTC announced a proposed rule to ban hidden and bogus junk fees, which can mask the total cost of concert tickets, hotel rooms and utility bills.

In April, the Transportation Department finalized rules that would require airlines to automatically issue cash refunds for things like delayed flights and to better disclose fees for baggage or reservation cancellations.

The department also has taken actions against individual companies accused of misleading customers.

In June, the Justice Department, referred by the FTC, filed a lawsuit against software maker Adobe and two of its executives, Maninder Sawhney and David Wadhwani, for allegedly pushing consumers toward the firm’s “annual paid monthly” subscription without properly disclosing that canceling the plan in the first year could cost hundreds of dollars.

Dana Rao, Adobe’s general counsel, said in an emailed statement that Adobe disagrees with the lawsuit’s characterization of its business and “we will refute the FTC’s claims in court.”

“The early termination fees equate to minimal impact to our revenue, accounting for less than half a percent of our total revenue globally, but is an important part of our ability to offer customers a choice in plans that balance cost and commitment,” Rao said.

Some business advocates are not a fan of the government’s overall efforts to crack down on junk fees.

Sean Heather, senior vice president of international regulatory affairs and antitrust at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the initiative is “nothing more than an attempt to micromanage businesses’ pricing structures, often undermining businesses’ ability to give consumers options at different price points.”

Read the whole story
acdha
25 days ago
reply
I expect all of the “both parties are the same” dudes are working overtime coming up with ways to sound like they know what they’re talking about claiming this doesn’t matter
Washington, DC
angelchrys
25 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories